Part 2.2 - Definition of Regulations to Promote Sustainable Buildings
2.2.1. Definition of the type of regulations to be issued to approve incentives
as well as definition of the route for their approval, which in some countries may depend on the type of incentives granted or the status and powers they have. For example, financial incentives usually require approval by the municipal council or town council. The approval of technical incentives can be given through a mayoral decree (Colombia), if in the Plan de Orden (Colombia), the municipal council or cabildo (Colombia) approves the incentives.
2.2.2 Definition of the chain of procedures linked to building
which has two objectives: the first would allow the identification of incentives in the reduction of terms or costs of permits or licenses for those who voluntarily certify their green projects, and the second would allow the identification of which procedures the documents derived from the certifications constitute as requirements if they wish to receive the incentives.
2.2.3. Scope of application of the regulations
It is recommended that the scope of application of the incentives be as broad as possible, being able to grant differentiated incentives in this, and be located in areas of interest for real estate development and thus generate an important impact.
ii. Scope by type of building
Defining the scope of the regulation should be aligned with the urban development objectives indicated by the Municipality. It is recommended that incentives be granted to all new, ongoing and existing projects throughout the municipality, as well as incentives differentiated by zoning, building typology or levels of sustainability achieved.
The municipality may specify one or several building typologies as beneficiaries of the incentives. This decision depends on factors such as the zoning of the municipality (commercial/ residential/industrial), or the gradualness with which a sustainable building program is to be implemented.
iii. Incentives
As mentioned above, incentives are internationally proven successful mechanisms to encourage the design and construction of efficient buildings. Taking into account international cases previously mentioned, the most frequently applied incentives are: Height bonus or buildability benefits, flexibility of parameters to build, celerity in building permits and tax benefits.
In order to ensure greater acceptance by the beneficiaries, it is advisable to offer a series of incentives aimed at both the builders/developers and the owners/users of the buildings. These may be of a technical and/or financial nature and, if possible, linked to the levels of efficiency reached by the project and the maintenance of sustainability measures, they may also be aimed at promoting sustainability in both new and existing buildings, the most important thing being that they fulfill their role of promoting sustainable buildings.
2.2.4. Verification mechanisms
The municipal government should ensure that both projects in the design stage and buildings already constructed meet the minimum standards required to be recognized as sustainable and, based on this, be eligible for the incentives offered by the regulations.
The use of green building certifications that comply with international standards is an efficient verification mechanism. These certifications provide a voluntary, independent third-party validation of the efficiency standards that must be met in the design and construction of the building.
The benefit of the use of certifications for the municipality are validation and audit by an independent third party, facilitating the verification of the latest version of sustainability standards without generating additional verification cost for the municipality.
It is recommended that the certifications that have a presence in the country be described in an annex to the municipal regulations to be approved.
When including additional mandatory measures, it is recommended to take into account:
The environmental benefit.
The capacity of the Municipality to verify it.
Economic feasibility to implement them.
Additional measures should not be stipulated in relation to the efficiency standards already reported by the certifications.
c. Additional mandatory measures
These are sustainability measures that are included as an additional requirement or in parallel to the certification.
In the case of Peru, some municipalities chose to include certain additional mandatory measures to the certifications such as, for example, the inclusion of green roofs; the use of translucent walls; the implementation of containers for waste classification; bicycle parking, among others. These measures should be verified directly by the municipality; however, the cost of implementing them should be taken into account because they may be counterproductive and reduce the results expected from the incentives.
Compliance measures are those that accredit and verify that the buildings effectively comply with the conditions to be recognized as sustainable.
16 In the case of Peru, the applicable regulation to offer construction incentives at the municipal level is an ordinance, which is proposed by the mayor and approved by the Municipal Council.
17 Not all municipalities and countries mandate pre-project approval;
18 An affidavit consists of verbal or written statements made by a person (“the affiant”) about his or her personal details, the veracity of which can be assured before a judicial or administrative authority. In Colombia, the affidavit is signed before a notary and may accompany the building permit application.
19 This is the authorization that determines the occupancy of the building, as well as its administrative registration with the public entity in charge of public registries or the transfer to its purchasers.